There is a role for regulators, but I am against over regulation for sure. I think even people who are extremely libertarian and free market think we should probably have somebody keeping an eye on the aurplane companies making sure they build a good aircraft. And, if you asked the average person if they want to get rid of the FAA, just like take a chance on manufacturers not cutting corners in the aircraft because profits were down that quarter. There are such agencies in every country. But in the car business we get regulated by the Department of Transportation, the EPA, and a couple of others. It is not fun being regulated, it is not –it can be pretty irksome. They were harmful to certain sets of people within society, but they were not harmful to society as a whole.ĪI is a fundamental existential risk for human civilization, and I don’t think people fully appreciate that. That, in the past, has been, bad but not something which represented a fundamental risk to the existence of civilization.ĪI is a fundamental risk to the existence of human civilization in a way that car accidents, airplane crashes, faulty drugs, or bad food were not. There is a lot of opposition from companies who don’t like being told what to do by regulators - it takes forever. And, I think we should all be really concerned about AI.ĪI is a rare case where I think we need to be proactive in regulation, instead of reactive.īy the time we are reactive with AI regulation it is too late.Īnd normally the way regulations are set up is: A while bunch of bad things happen, there is a public outcry, and after many years a regulatory agency is set up to regulate that industry. Until people see, like, robots going down the street killing people, they don’t know how to react, because it seems so ethereal. BRIAN SANDOVAL, R-NV: Are robots going to take all our jobs, everybody’s jobs, in the future? How much do you see artificial intelligence coming into the workplace?ĮLON MUSK, TESLA, SPACE-X: Well first of all, on the artificial intelligence front, I have exposure to the most cutting edge AI, and I think people should be really concerned about it. How convenient.This is the Full transcript of Elon Musk’s discussion of AI at the bipartisan National Governors Association Conference on July 15, 2017. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.Īn unelected, lifetime-appointed Supreme Court justice, caught in a major ethics scandal, believes that Congress has no authority to do anything about it. In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. Here’s what Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution actually says: Second, Alito’s reading of the Constitution is particularly twisted. Right-wing activist Leonard Leo helped organize the whole thing. Alito didn’t disclose the vacation and later ruled on a case that Singer had before the court. Last month, ProPublica reported that he accepted a luxury vacation from Republican billionaire megadonor Paul Singer, which included flying on Singer’s private jet to Alaska and then staying for free in a fishing lodge that cost $1,000 a night. First, he is one of the justices recently caught in a major ethics scandal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |